DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.22 a Task vs $2.35 — AI Digest

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.22 a Task vs $2.35 — AI Digest

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 matches Opus 5.5 on long browser tasks at $0.22 instead of $2.35, about ten times cheaper. Plus a 10-second FLUX 3 Max clip for about $1.70, MiniMax M3.1 Flash with a 93% hallucination rate, Google Harness² and Anthropic OSS Scanner.

What matters for you today: on October 21, 2026, the price of AI work dropped again by a multiple — an open model runs an agent task ten times cheaper than a flagship, and a 10-second video clip costs under two dollars. The number to track is cost per task and error rate, not cost per token.

Top stories today

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: $0.22 instead of $2.35 per task, ten times cheaper than Opus 5.5

DeepSeek released DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, an MIT-licensed open model that scored 75/100 on long-horizon browser use, matching Opus 5.5, at $0.22 versus $2.35 per task.

Token pricing stays at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens at peak hours, and half that off-peak. On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index it scores 45, up 6 points, tying GLM-5.3 for second place among open-weight models at $0.26 per task. Its non-hallucination rate on AA-Omniscience jumped from 4% to 33%, and it is the top open model in Code Arena WebDev with 1670 points.

An MoE model is a model that activates only part of its parameters for each request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 uses 16B of 552B, with a 1M-token context window.

What it means: everyone compares price per token; the number that matters is price per task. $2.35 / $0.22 ≈ 10.7, so an agent that works through websites costs about ten times less for the same score on this test.

Sources: Artificial Analysis · detail · Arena · browser_use · open-source LLM guide

FLUX 3 Max: a 10-second clip for about $1.70 in 12 seconds

FLUX 3 Max, the fal and BFL video model, renders a 10-second clip in about 12 seconds at $10.20 per minute of 720p video, according to Artificial Analysis.

For a 10-second clip that works out to $10.20 / 60 × 10 = $1.70. Generation takes roughly as long as the clip itself runs: 12 seconds for 10 seconds of video.

The per-minute price is the rate for a single generation; every redone take is billed again, so the cost of a finished clip is higher than $1.70.

What it means: client work. When one generation costs about $1.70, the value of a commissioned clip sits in the idea, choosing the best takes and the edit, not in the render itself. The render is now the cheapest part of the job by a wide margin.

Sources: Artificial Analysis

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: $0.15 per million tokens, but a 93% hallucination rate

MiniMax launched MiniMax M3.1 Flash at $0.15/$0.60 per million input/output tokens and says the weights will ship on October 23, 2026.

MiniMax claims 3x the speed of M3 at a third of the cost and 74% on DeepSWE. Artificial Analysis independently scores it 42, level with GLM-5.3-Flash and below the 45 of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, at about $0.22 per task. "Space Bunny," the stealth model that topped usage leaderboards, turned out to be an earlier build of MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

A hallucination is a confident model answer that the facts do not support. MiniMax M3.1 Flash hallucinates 93% of the time on that evaluation because it attempts nearly every question instead of admitting it does not know.

What it means: profession and trust. For lawyers, finance staff and HR, a model like this is fine for drafts and summaries but not for facts, dates and figures, because it almost never says "I don't know." Saving $0.04 per task against DeepSeek does not pay for checking every answer.

Sources: MiniMax · Artificial Analysis · r/LocalLLaMA

Ethan Mollick: 180 models beat GPT-4, and a correct answer got 750 times cheaper

In an essay marking the release of his book Co-Existence on October 20, 2026, Ethan Mollick counts 180 AI models that outperform GPT-4 as it was at launch, nineteen of which run on a modern smartphone.

On the METR Long Horizon benchmark, the amount of human work an AI can complete from a single prompt with at least a 50% success rate doubled eight times after GPT-4: a four-minute task in 2024, 17 hours of work by April 2026, after which METR said its methods could no longer measure it. Mollick adds that one correct answer on the GPQA exam fell from 30 cents to four hundredths of a cent: 30 / 0.04 = 750 times cheaper.

What it means: business. A task worth many hours of an employee's time can now go to AI in one prompt, but METR's yardstick is success half the time. Hand over long tasks, and keep a person on checking the result.

Sources: One Useful Thing

Google Harness² lets an agent rewrite its own harness, adding 8.4 points for Gemini 3.5 Flash

Google Research open-sourced Harness² under Apache 2.0, a framework in which an agent edits its own harness while the model weights stay frozen; Gemini 3.5 Flash gained 8.4 points on WorkBuddy-Bench and 7.5 on JobBench.

About half of all edits targeted skills and scripts. In Harness², an editor agent proposes changes, a composer diffs trajectories against a baseline, and a reflector stores lessons for later tasks, with no separate grader required.

A harness is the scaffolding around a model: the system prompt, skills, hooks, memory and tools through which an agent acts. Think of it as the kitchen around a chef: same chef, better dishes. Skeptics on Reddit warn that a self-improving harness can overfit to the benchmark and eat into the limited context of local models.

What it means: for builders. The gain came from rewritten scaffolding, not a new model, and half of it sits in skills. Before switching models, rebuild the agent's skills and instructions.

Sources: akshay_pachaar · _philschmid · google-research/harness2 · r/LocalLLaMA · Claude Code skills guide

Anthropic OSS Scanner reports 77 critical findings in open-source code in its first week

Anthropic launched OSS Scanner, a free program of periodic vulnerability scans for critical open-source projects that ships proofs of concept and patches; in its first week the model rated 77 findings critical and 803 high, including a fix for curl.

The launch landed next to a telling incident: OpenCode reported a sustained 48-hour attack by agent swarms. Mid-incident, frontier models refused to help analyze the attack because the malicious payloads tripped their guardrails. Things reportedly improved once OpenCode got access to Daybreak Blue.

A guardrail is a model rule that makes it refuse to handle dangerous content; in the OpenCode incident, guardrails failed to tell analysis of an attack apart from a harmful request.

What it means: for builders. A defensive model has to be able to read hostile code, or it is useless at the exact moment it is needed. If your project runs on open-source libraries, check which of them are already covered by the scans.

Sources: ClaudeDevs · thdxr · AndrewCurran_ · kimmonismus

Muse Glimmer 30B and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt: open models on a single 24GB GPU

Meta released Muse Glimmer, a 30B-parameter open-weight agentic model designed to run at 4-bit on a single consumer GPU.

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B total / 9B active) fits in about 23.75GB of VRAM including its vision projector. LiquidAI LFM2.5-24B-A2B gets praise on Reddit as a strong local coding model.

Running at 4-bit is quantization: the model's weights are stored at lower precision, so it takes several times less memory at the cost of a small loss in accuracy.

What it means: business. A clinic or law office that cannot send documents to an outside service now has models that run on one computer with one GPU, so the data never leaves the building.

Sources: AIatMeta · r/LocalLLaMA · LFM2.5-24B-A2B · AI SKILLS Open Source section

Numbers and facts

Our own summary of the week's budget models, based on Artificial Analysis data and vendor statements as of October 21, 2026.

ModelPrice per 1M tokens (in/out)AA indexCost per taskWeights
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.30 / $1.2045$0.26open, MIT
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.15 / $0.6042~$0.22promised for Oct 23, 2026

Different perspectives: is distillation why Chinese models are closing the gap?

Chinese open-weight models such as DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 trail closed leaders by a few points at a fraction of the cost per task, and the argument is over how much of that closeness comes from distillation, meaning training on the outputs of stronger third-party models.

Tools and techniques

In brief